top of page
Research Articles






Moses D Lugos *, Umanka Y Polit, James G Damen


ABSTRACT:Sandwich ELISA is a modified form of the standard ELISA technique used by researchers and in routine laboratories for detecting and quantifying specific analytes in samples. This study is designed to evaluate the impact offreeze-thaw cycles on the results of serum cytokine measurement by sandwich ELISA technique. Serum samples were collected from four healthy donors and stored in 3 aliquots at -80oC for three days per thaw-freeze cycle.  The concentrations of IL-4, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-9 in the aliquots of serum samples exposed to one, two and three freeze-thaw cycles respectively were determined.   Data shows an increase in the cytokine levels following two and three freeze-thaw cycles compared to the expression levels obtained after one freeze-thaw cycle (baseline). The increases reported are as follows: IL-4; 6.56pg/ml (19%) and 3.52pg/ml (10%), IL-6; 103pg/ml (20.9%) and 24.6pg/ml (5%), IL-8; 105.05pg/ml (14%) and 102.76pg/ml (11%) and IL-9; 117pg/ml (17.77%) and as high as 312pg/ml (47.52%) respectively. These results suggest that the repeated thawing and freezing of serum samples can alter the values of serum cytokines measured by ELISA, in most cases with an increase. The reasons for the increase in the values of these cytokines following repeated thawing and freezing have not been investigated. To minimize the effects of thaw-freeze cycles on serum cytokine ELISA, fresh serum samples should be used for the analysis of serum cytokines. Alternatively, aliquots of serum samples can be stored in the -80°C Freezers for single use or by the application of a methodology that will subject samples to similar treatments, for instance, analysing several samples in parallel as in Multiplex assay. These approaches will minimise variations due to repetitive freeze-thaw cycles.

KEY WORDS: Sandwich ELISA, Freeze-thaw cycles, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-9


  1. Van Weemen, B. and A. Schuurs, Immunoassay using antigen—enzyme conjugates. FEBS letters, 1971. 15(3): p. 232-236.

  2.  Nakamura, R.M. and W.R. Dito, Nonradioisotopic immunoassays for therapeutic drug monitoring. Laboratory Medicine, 2016. 11(12): p. 807-817.

  3. Robinson, D.L. and J.M. Lau, Assessment of an ELISA laboratory exercise. The american biology Teacher, 2012. 74(8): p. 558-563.

  4. Hornbeck, P.V., Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays. Current protocols in immunology, 2015. 110(1): p. 2.1. 1-2.1. 23.

  5. Aydin, S., A short history, principles, and types of ELISA, and our laboratory experience with peptide/protein analyses using ELISA. Peptides, 2015. 72: p. 4-15.

  6. Gan, S.D. and K.R. Patel, Enzyme immunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Invest Dermatol, 2013. 133(9): p. e12.

  7. Thakur, K., et al., Revisiting the dilution factor as vital parameter for sensitivity of ELISA assay in CSF and Plasma. Annals of neurosciences, 2015. 22(1): p. 37.

  8. Bullock, S.L. and K.W. Walls, Evaluation of some of the parameters of the enzyme-linked immunospecific assay. Journal of infectious diseases, 1977. 136(Supplement 2): p. S279-S285.

  9. Miura, K., et al., Development and characterization of a standardized ELISA including a reference serum on each plate to detect antibodies induced by experimental malaria vaccines. Vaccine, 2008. 26(2): p. 193-200.

  10. Cox, K.L., et al., Immunoassay methods. 2014.

  11. Engvall, E. and P. Perlmann, Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA III. Quantitation of specific antibodies by enzyme-labeled anti-immunoglobulin in antigen-coated tubes. The Journal of Immunology, 1972. 109(1): p. 129-135.

  12. Plikaytis, B.D., et al., Comparisons of standard curve-fitting methods to quantitate Neisseria meningitidis group A polysaccharide antibody levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Journal of clinical microbiology, 1991. 29(7): p. 1439-1446.

  13. Flynn, S., et al., Factors affecting enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for insulin antibodies in serum. Clinical chemistry, 1981. 27(10): p. 1753-1757.

  14. Reverberi, R. and L. Reverberi, Factors affecting the antigen-antibody reaction. Blood transfusion, 2007. 5(4): p. 227

  15. Le Bon, A. and D.F. Tough, Links between innate and adaptive immunity via type I interferon. Current opinion in immunology, 2002. 14(4): p. 432-436.

  16. Zhou, X., et al., Conceptual and methodological issues relevant to cytokine and inflammatory marker measurements in clinical research. Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 2010. 13(5): p. 541.

  17. Lee, J.-E., S.Y. Kim, and S.-Y. Shin, Effect of repeated freezing and thawing on biomarker stability in plasma and serum samples. Osong public health and research perspectives, 2015. 6(6): p. 357-362.

  18. Pinsky, N.A., et al., Effect of multiple freeze-thaw cycles on detection of measles, mumps, and rubella virus antibodies. Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 2003. 10(1): p. 19-21.

  19. Aziz, N., et al., Analytical performance of a highly sensitive C-reactive protein-based immunoassay and the effects of laboratory variables on levels of protein in blood. Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 2003. 10(4): p. 652-657.

  20. Wang, J., et al., Effects of storage conditions on the stability of serum CD163, NGAL, HMGB1 and MIP2. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. 8(4): p. 4099.

  21. Kragstrup, T.W., et al., A simple set of validation steps identifies and removes false results in a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay caused by anti-animal IgG antibodies in plasma from arthritis patients. Springerplus, 2013. 2(1): p. 263.

bottom of page