Research Articles




Haytahm Dahlawi

ABSTRACT:Background:Since, clinical laboratory results play an important role in patient’s diagnosis, investigationand treatment. Thus, errors with laboratory tests might lead to inappropriate medical decision-making. Such errors can be pre-analytical, analytical, and/or post-analytical errors. However, the vast majority of errors arise during manually intensive pre-analytical phase and more than 90% of errors occurred at the process outside the walls of the laboratory. This study aimed to assess the number of the frequency of pre-analytical errors occurring in a hemaetology laboratory at Hera’a General Hospital.Method:this study was a retrospective one and carried out in hematology lab at Hera’a General Hospital from January 2016 to December 2016. All samples received during this period in hematology lab were included.Results: total samples received in hematology lab were 110240 during the study period, out of which 2256 were rejected. The most frequent pre-analytical error was the clotted blood samples with 79%. The second most common cause was the haemolysed samples (9%), followed by insufficient blood volume (8%). This study also showed that the lowest cause for rejection was reported with the incomplete request. Moreover, the highest specimen rejection percentage was observed in intensive care unit. Discussion:the accurate laboratory results are vital for patient health. Thus, quality improvement in patients safety and healthcare would be improved with daily registration of pre-analytical errors occurring in the lab, proper sampling procedure training and education to all staff, coordination between lab and the hospital ward staff and computerization of the laboratory.

KEYWORDS:Pre-analytical, Laboratory errors, HematologyLaboratory, Rejections.



1. Astion ML, Shojania KG, Hamill TR, Kim S, Ng VL. Classifying laboratory incident reports to identify problems that jeopardize patient safety. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2003;120(1):18-26.

2. Datta P. Resolving discordant specimens. ADVANCE for Administrators of the Laboratory. 2005;60.

3. Lippi G. Governance of preanalytical variability: travelling the right path to the bright side of the moon? Clinica Chimica Acta. 2009;404(1):32-6.

4. Plebani M, Piva E. Medical errors: pre-analytical issue in patient safety. Journal of Medical Biochemistry. 2010;29(4):310-4.

5. Lippi G, Guidi GC, Mattiuzzi C, Plebani M. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing. Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine. 2006;44(4):358-65.

6. Chawla R, Goswami B, Tayal D, Mallika V. Identification of the types of preanalytical errors in the clinical chemistry laboratory: 1-year study at GB Pant Hospital. Laboratory Medicine. 2010;41(2):89-92.

7. Goswami B, Singh B, Chawla R, Mallika V. Evaluation of errors in a clinical laboratory: a one-year experience. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2010;48(1):63-6.

8. Lippi G, Becan-McBride K, Behúlová D, Bowen RA, Church S, Delanghe J, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. 2013;51(1):229-41.

9. Rana Ghazi Zaini NT. Comparison between the accuracy of a rapid point-of-care HIV test TOYO versus ELISA, Western Blot, and RT-PCR analysis. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health. 2016;5(5):877-91.

10. Upreti S, Upreti S, Bansal R, Jeelani N, Bharat V. Types and Frequency of Preanalytical Errors in Haematology Lab. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2013;7(11):2491.

11. Chhillar N, Khurana S, Agarwal R, Singh NK. Effect of pre-analytical errors on quality of                                     laboratory medicine at a neuropsychiatry institute in north India. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry. 2011;26(1):46-9.

12. Plebani M. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine. 2006;44(6):750-9.

13. Gunnur Dikmen Z, Pinar A, Akbiyik F. Specimen rejection in laboratory medicine: Necessary for patient safety? Biochemia medica. 2015;25(3):377-85.

14. Lippi G, Blanckaert N, Bonini P, Green S, Kitchen S, Palicka V, et al. Haemolysis: an overview of the leading cause of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2008;46(6):764-72.

15. Stark A, Jones BA, Chapman D, Well K, Krajenta R, Meier FA, et al. Clinical laboratory specimen rejection-association with the site of patient care and patients' characteristics: findings from a single health care organization. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2007;131(4):588-92.

Basics and upadate on flow cytometry related research

IJMLR events

   Article are invited for

         Vol 5, Issue 2,

         May-Aug 2020

  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • Google+ - Black Circle

Copyright © 2016 International Journal of Medical Laboratory Research. All right reserved