top of page
Research Article





Anita Rani, Arpita Saxena, Sukanya Gangopadhyay


ABSTRACT: Introduction: Preanalytical variables account for maximum percentage of errors in lab reports. Analyzing knowledge, attitude and practices of technicians regarding preanalytical variables will give us insight to many future policies/decisions. Materials and Methods: This study was aimed to assess the level of knowledge, attitude and practices among medical laboratory personnel regarding pre-analytical variables in biochemistry laboratory before and after training sessions using questionnaire involving 32 technicians.  Prevalidated knowledge attitude and practice questionnaire was given to all the participants before and after training session.  Results: The study included a total of 32 laboratory technicians who were sub-grouped on the basis of experience; group A ≤5yrs experience and group B >5yrs. Pre-training knowledge showed significant positive correlation with the years of experience. Knowledge score was average in 34% technicians which became good (>75%) in all participants after training. Attitude was in good category (50-75% score) in all even before training. With training, it showed statistically significant further improvement in both groups especially in the more experienced group. However, practice score was average in all participants. But it improved very significantly (p=0.0001) after training.  Conclusion: Knowledge and attitude regarding preanalytical variables is better in experienced technicians. However, the practices for preventing preanalytical errors are not up to the mark in both groups; but it improves significantly with training. Thus laboratories should be engaged in frequent training activities as it takes a lot of effort both at individual and management level to put knowledge and attitude into practice.

KEY WORDS: Knowledge, Attitude, Practices, Preanalytical variables, prevalidated, questionnaire.


  1. R, Dinant GJ. Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Rational, cost effective use of investigations in clinical practice. BMJ. 2002;324(7340):783.

  2. Rohr UP, Binder C, Dieterle T, Giusti F, Messina CG, Toerien E et al. The Value of In Vitro Diagnostic Testing in Medical Practice: A Status Report. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0149856. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0154008.

  3. Abdollahi A, Saffar H, Saffar H. Types and Frequency of Errors during Different Phases of Testing At a Clinical Medical Laboratory of a Teaching Hospital in Tehran, Iran. N Am J Med Sci. 2014;6(5):224-8.

  4. Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA, Rokn AR, Khorsand A, Aghajani H, Amini A, Shamshiri AR et al. Designing and standardizing a questionnaire for evaluating knowledge, attitude, and practice of Iranian adults with cardiovascular diseases about oral health. ARYA Atheroscler. 2013;9(6):350-6.

  5. Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53-5.

  6. Graphpad quickcalcs online calculator assessed from on 20.11.2020.

  7. Theodorsson E. Quality Assurance in Clinical Chemistry: A Touch of Statistics and A Lot of Common Sense. J Med Biochem. 2016;35(2):103-12.

  8. Milutinovic D, Andrrijevic I, Licina M, Andrijevic L. Confidence level in venepunture and knowledge on causes of invitrohemolysis among health care professionals. Biochem Medica 2015;25(3):401-9

  9. Dorotic A, Antoncic D, Biljak VR, Nedic D, Beletic A. Hemolysis from a nurses standpoint-survey from four Croatian Hospitals. Biochem Medica 2015;25(3):393-400

  10. Jagannatha SB, Chandrakar S. Study on “Assessment of Knowledge and Skills on PRE-ANALYTICAL VARIABLES Influencing Laboratory Testing” Among Laboratory Technicians and Nurses. Int J Biotech Biochem. 2018; 14 (3):167-75.

  11. Zinder O. Educating a new generation of clinical laboratory scientists. ClinChimActa. 2002; 319:149-53

 To cite this article:

Rani A, Saxena A, Gangopadhyay S. Knowledge, attitude and practices to reduce preanalytical errors in a tertiary care hospital based laboratory in north india. Int. J. Med. Lab. Res. 2020; 5,3:33-38.

bottom of page