International Journal of Medical Laboratory Research (IJMLR)

REVIEW OF LABORATORY MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: CURRENT SCOPE, EMERGING TRENDS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

 

Tanvir Ahmed, Kazi Afsana Begum

​

ABSTRACT: Clinical laboratories generate a substantial proportion of the data used in medical decision making. In the past, "quality" in the laboratory mostly meant instrument quality control but over the past decades the understanding has changed, and quality is now understood to span the total testing process, from pre-analytical phase to post-analytical phase. This review aims to describe where laboratory management and quality improvement stand today and what new trends are appearing and how they can be implemented in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This is a narrative review, and literature was gathered from peer-reviewed journals, systematic reviews, and guidance documents from bodies such as ISO, CAP, CLIA, WHO and IFCC. Modern laboratory quality management combines accreditation (ISO 15189, CAP, CLIA), quality indicators, internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assessment (EQA), risk management, and improvement tools like Lean and Six Sigma. Digital tools, including laboratory information systems, and artificial intelligence, are becoming more common but are not yet accessible to every part of the world, and the evidence for some of the newer technologies is still limited. Resource-limited settings face additional challenges, but programs like SLIPTA and SLMTA show that stepwise progress is possible even without full accreditation. Additionally, cybersecurity is becoming a bigger concern as laboratories become more digital. Laboratory quality management needs to emphasize especially in connecting quality measures to real patient outcomes, and in making sure new technologies are properly tested before wide use.

​

Keywords: Laboratory quality management; ISO 15189; quality indicators; external quality assessment; Six Sigma; artificial intelligence in laboratory medicine.

​

​

REFERENCE: 

1. [1]. Plebani M. Quality in laboratory medicine: 50 years on. Clinical Biochemistry. 2017 Feb 1;50(3):101-4.

2. [2]. Rohr UP, Binder C, Dieterle T, Giusti F, Messina CG, Toerien E, Moch H, Schäfer HH. The value of in vitro diagnostic testing in medical practice: a status report. PloS one. 2016 Mar 4;11(3):e0149856.

3. [3]. Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Aita A. Quality indicators for the total testing process. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine. 2017 Mar 1;37(1):187-205.

4. [4]. Plebani M, Laposata M, Lundberg GD. The brain-to-brain loop concept for laboratory testing 40 years after its introduction. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2011 Dec 1;136(6):829-33.

5. [5]. Hamid SR, Isa S, Chew BC, Altun A. Quality management evolution from the past to present: Challenges for tomorrow. Organizacija. 2019;52(3):157-86.

6. [6]. Tsimillis KC, Michael S. Accreditation of medical laboratories: What is new in ISO 15189: 2022. Accreditation and Quality Assurance. 2024 Apr;29(2):175-82.

7. [7]. Jovičić SŽ, Vitkus D. Digital transformation towards the clinical laboratory of the future. Perspectives for the next decade. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2023 Mar 1;61(4):567-9.

8. [8]. Genzen JR. Regulation of laboratory-developed tests: a clinical laboratory perspective. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2019 Jul 5;152(2):122-31.

9. [9]. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. QMS01: A Quality Management System Model for Laboratory Services. 6th ed. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2019.

10. [10]. Njoroge SW, Nichols JH. Risk management in the clinical laboratory. Annals of Laboratory Medicine. 2014 Jun 19;34(4):274.

11. [11]. Barth JH. Clinical quality indicators in laboratory medicine. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry. 2012 Jan;49(1):9-16.

12. [12]. Sciacovelli L, Panteghini M, Lippi G, Sumarac Z, Cadamuro J, Galoro CA, Pino Castro IG, Shcolnik W, Plebani M. Defining a roadmap for harmonizing quality indicators in Laboratory Medicine: a consensus statement on behalf of the IFCC Working Group “Laboratory Error and Patient Safety” and EFLM Task and Finish Group “Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases”. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2017 Aug 28;55(10):1478-88.

13. [13]. Parikh KD, Rupani MP. Exploring the impact of national laboratory accreditation on quality and practices: a qualitative study from a government medical college in western India. BMC Health Services Research. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):1005.

14. [14]. Takahashi S. ISO 15189 accreditation: enhancing laboratory performance, safety, and personnel competence. Journal of Laboratory Medicine. 2026 Feb 24;50(1):3-9.

15. [15]. Zneimer SM, Hongo D. Preparing for clinical laboratory improvement amendments (CLIA) and college of American pathologists (CAP) inspections. Current Protocols. 2021 Dec;1(12):e324.

16. [16]. Nah EH, Cho S, Kim S, Cho HI, Stingu CS, Eschrich K, Thiel J, Borgmann T, Schaumann R, Rodloff AC, Park H. International organization for standardization (ISO) 15189. Annals of Laboratory Medicine. 2017 Sep;37(5):365-70.

17. [17]. De Guire V, Galoro CA, Ibarz M, Ivanov A, Lippi G, Zhou R, Sciacovelli L, Sengupta Neogi S, Shaw J, Shcolnik W, Smeets RL. Recommendations from the IFCC Working Group on Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety for the global adoption of an essential quality indicators panel in laboratory medicine. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2026 Mar 26;64(4):806-12.

18. [18]. Alsina Kirchner MJ, Funes VA, Adzet CB, Clar M, Escuer MI, Girona JM, Pastor Barellas RM, Perich Alsina C, Ricos Aguila C, Trujillo Isern G, Vilanova Navarro C. Quality indicators and specifications for key processes in clinical laboratories: a preliminary experience. Clinical Chemistry & Laboratory Medicine. 2007 May 1;45(5).

19. [19]. Gruber L, Hausch A, Mueller T. Internal quality controls in the medical laboratory: A narrative review of the basic principles of an appropriate quality control plan. Diagnostics. 2024 Oct 5;14(19):2223..

20. [20]. Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Six sigma quality management system and design of risk-based statistical quality control. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine. 2017 Mar 1;37(1):85-96.

21. [21]. Boeras DI, Peeling RW, Onyebujoh P, Yahaya AA, Gumede-Moeletsi HN, Ndihokubwayo JB. The WHO AFRO external quality assessment programme (EQAP): linking laboratory networks through EQA programmes: lessons from the field. African journal of laboratory medicine. 2016 Jan 1;5(2):1-6.

22. [22]. Plebani M, Astion ML, Barth JH, Chen W, de Oliveira Galoro CA, Escuer MI, Ivanov A, Miller WG, Petinos P, Sciacovelli L, Shcolnik W. Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2014 Jul 1;52(7):951-8.

23. [23]. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 22367: 2020 Medical Laboratories—Application of Risk Management to Medical Laboratories.

24. [24]. Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Establishing evidence-based statistical quality control practices. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2019 Mar 1;151(4):364-70.

25. [25]. van Heerden M, George JA, Khoza S. The application of sigma metrics in the laboratory to assess quality control processes in South Africa. African Journal of Laboratory Medicine. 2022 Jun 22;11(1):1344.

26. [26]. Thakur V, Akerele OA, Randell E. Lean and Six Sigma as continuous quality improvement frameworks in the clinical diagnostic laboratory. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences. 2023 Jan 2;60(1):63-81.

27. [27]. Rathi R, Vakharia A, Shadab M. Lean six sigma in the healthcare sector: A systematic literature review. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022 Jan 1;50:773-81.

28. [28]. Inal TC, Goruroglu Ozturk O, Kibar F, Cetiner S, Matyar S, Daglioglu G, Yaman A. Lean six sigma methodologies improve clinical laboratory efficiency and reduce turnaround times. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 2018 Jan;32(1):e22180.

29. [29]. Radnor Z, Osborne SP. Lean: a failed theory for public services? Public Management Review. 2013 Feb 1;15(2):265-87.

30. [30]. Halstead DC, Sautter RL. A literature review on how we can address medical laboratory scientist staffing shortages. Laboratory Medicine. 2023 Jan 1;54(1):e31-6.

31. [31]. Randell EW, Yenice S, Wamono AA, Orth M. Autoverification of test results in the core clinical laboratory. Clinical Biochemistry. 2019 Nov 1;73:11-25.

32. [32]. Cherkaoui A, Renzi G, Martischang R, Harbarth S, Vuilleumier N, Schrenzel J. Impact of total laboratory automation on turnaround times for urine cultures and screening specimens for MRSA, ESBL, and VRE carriage: retrospective comparison with manual workflow. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2020 Oct 28;10:552122.

33. [33]. Pantanowitz L, Sinard JH, Henricks WH, Fatheree LA, Carter AB, Contis L, Beckwith BA, Evans AJ, Lal A, Parwani AV. Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2013 Dec 1;137(12):1710-22.

34. [34]. Cheng JY, Abel JT, Balis UG, McClintock DS, Pantanowitz L. Challenges in the development, deployment, and regulation of artificial intelligence in anatomic pathology. The American Journal of Pathology. 2021 Oct 1;191(10):1684-92.

35. [35]. Fraggetta F, L’imperio V, Ameisen D, Carvalho R, Leh S, Kiehl TR, Serbanescu M, Racoceanu D, Della Mea V, Polonia A, Zerbe N. Best practice recommendations for the implementation of a digital pathology workflow in the anatomic pathology laboratory by the European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP). Diagnostics. 2021 Nov 22;11(11):2167.

36. [36]. Rabbani N, Kim GY, Suarez CJ, Chen JH. Applications of machine learning in routine laboratory medicine: Current state and future directions. Clinical Biochemistry. 2022 May 1; 103:1-7.

37. [37]. Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-53.

38. [38]. Datema TA, Oskam L, Broerse JE, Klatser PR. Review of the stepwise laboratory quality improvement process towards accreditation (SLIPTA) version 2: 2015. African Journal of Laboratory Medicine. 2020;9(1):1-7.

39. [39]. Vlahou A, Hallinan D, Apweiler R, Argiles A, Beige J, Benigni A, Bischoff R, Black PC, Boehm F, Céraline J, Chrousos GP. Data sharing under the General Data Protection Regulation: time to harmonize law and research ethics?. Hypertension. 2021 Apr;77(4):1029-35.

40. [40]. Argaw ST, Troncoso-Pastoriza JR, Lacey D, Florin MV, Calcavecchia F, Anderson D, Burleson W, Vogel JM, O'Leary C, Eshaya-Chauvin B, Flahault A. Cybersecurity of Hospitals: discussing the challenges and working towards mitigating the risks. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2020 Jul 3;20(1):1-10.​

41. [41]. Jalali MS, Landman A, Gordon WJ. Telemedicine, privacy, and information security in the age of COVID-19. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2021 Mar 1;28(3):671-2.

42. [42]. Kruse CS, Frederick B, Jacobson T, Monticone DK. Cybersecurity in healthcare: A systematic review of modern threats and trends. Technology and Health Care. 2017 Jan;25(1):1-10.

43. [43]. Maruta T, Matu M, Moyo S. Barriers to implementation of quality management systems in laboratories: Lessons from the Southern Africa TB Health Systems Project. American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science. 2024 Jun 20.

44. [44]. Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MA, Lowery J. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implementation Science. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75.