International Journal of Medical Laboratory Research (IJMLR)

UTILIZATION OF BIOCHEMISTRY ANALYZERS IN A TERTIARY CARE LABORATORY IN SRI LANKA: A MIXED-METHOD STUDY

 

Wishva Rathnayake, Tarinya Rathnayake

​

ABSTRACT:

Background: Efficient utilization of laboratory equipment is essential for high-quality patient care and effective use of healthcare resources. However, evidence on equipment utilization in tertiary-care laboratories with high testing volumes remains limited. This study assessed biochemistry analyzer utilization and contributing operational factors at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka. Methods: A mixed-methods descriptive study was conducted using retrospective laboratory workload data from January to October 2023 and key informant interviews. Utilization coefficient (UC) was calculated as actual tests performed divided by theoretical analytical capacity. A UC below 50% was used as an operational classification criterion for underutilization based on previous medical equipment utilization research, rather than as an optimal utilization target. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically, and Fishbone and Pareto analyses were used to identify and prioritize contributing factors.

Results: Six functional biochemistry analyzers were assessed, with four operating during daytime and two at night. The laboratory processed an average of 182,318 tests monthly, comprising 98,880 daytime and 83,438 nighttime tests. Overall UC was 10.7%, with higher utilization during daytime (16.1%) than nighttime (7.6%). The low UC reflected a substantial difference between theoretical analytical capacity and actual workload. The principal contributing factors identified through Pareto analysis were supply–demand mismatch of equipment, interrupted reagent supply, and reagent wastage. Conclusion: The findings indicate substantial excess theoretical analytical capacity relative to the workload during the study period. Equipment planning should consider historical and projected workload, shift-specific demand, analyzer capabilities, reagent requirements, and reserve capacity. Improved reagent supply management and potential referral of selected routine, non-urgent tests could also support more efficient use of existing laboratory infrastructure.

​

Keywords: Laboratory Equipment Utilization, Utilization coefficient, Clinical biochemistry laboratory, Tertiary healthcare.

​

​

REFERENCE: 

1. Diaconu K, Chen YF, Cummins C, Jimenez Moyao G, Manaseki-Holland S, Lilford R. Methods for medical device and equipment procurement and prioritization within low- and middle-income countries: findings of a systematic literature review. Global Health. 2017;13(1):59.

2. Geta ET, Terefa DR, Desisa AE. Efficiency of medical equipment utilization and its associated factors at public referral hospitals in East Wollega Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Med Devices (Auckl). 2023; 16:37–46.

3. Perry L, Malkin R. Effectiveness of medical equipment donations to improve health systems: how much medical equipment is broken in the developing world? Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011;49(7):719–722.

4. Wondafrash B, Tebeje B, Assaye A. Availability and utilization of medical devices in Jimma zone hospitals, Southwest Ethiopia: a case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16:287.

5. Atabonfack B, Issah A, Baaki M, Ingabire C, Olusuyi T, Adewole M, et al. Empowering medical equipment sustainability in low-resource settings: an AI-powered diagnostic and support platform for biomedical technicians. 2026.

6. Desalign D, Keno D, Kaba Z. Assessment of availability and utilization of medical equipment’s in Nekemte Specialized Hospital, August 2021. Am J Biomed Life Sci. 2023;11(1):15–21.

7. Chaudhary P, Kaul P. Factors affecting utilization of medical diagnostic equipment: A study at a tertiary healthcare setup of Chandigarh. CHRISMED J Health Res. 2015;2(4):316–323.

8. World Health Organization. Needs assessment for medical devices [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011 [cited 2026 Sep 4]. (WHO medical device technical series). Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/44562/9789241501385-eng.pdf

9. Belete R, Cheneke W, Getachew A, Seid AA. Challenges of clinical chemistry analyzers utilization in public hospital laboratories of selected zones of Oromia region, Ethiopia: a mixed methods study [Internet]. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res. 2021;34(4). Available from: https://biomedres.us/fulltexts/BJSTR.MS.ID.005584.php

10. Ranasinghe RADVS. Factors affecting the effective usage of medical equipment in Sri Lankan hospitals. 16th International Research Conference; 2023.

11. Chaminda JLP, Dharmagunawardene D, Rohde A, Kularatna S, Hinchcliff R. Implementation of a multicomponent program to improve effective use and maintenance of medical equipment in Sri Lankan hospitals. WHO South-East Asia J Public Health. 2023; 12:85–92.

12. Patnaik SK, Kushagra PD, Sahran D, Kalita BJ, Kumar B, Prusty H, et al. Optimising medical equipment utilisation and serviceability: a data-driven approach through insights from five healthcare institutions. Med J Armed Forces India. 2026;82(1):55–64.